News Page

Main Content

C.D.C. Website No Longer Rejects Possible Link Between Autism and Vaccines

The New York Times's profile
Original Story by The New York Times
November 20, 2025
C.D.C. Website No Longer Rejects Possible Link Between Autism and Vaccines

Context:

The CDC has revised its website to reflect skepticism about the link between vaccines and autism, aligning with the views of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This update contradicts previous statements that firmly denied any association, despite extensive scientific research supporting vaccine safety. The change has garnered praise from anti-vaccine advocates while drawing sharp criticism from medical experts who warn it undermines scientific consensus and sets a troubling precedent. Additionally, the CDC removed content regarding the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women, citing updates needed for alignment with new recommendations. The implications of these changes on public health communications are significant.

Dive Deeper:

  • The CDC's new webpage states that the claim 'vaccines do not cause autism' is not evidence-based, suggesting that studies have not fully ruled out a possible link, despite decades of research indicating no connection.

  • Previous versions of the CDC webpage pointed to a 2012 National Academy of Medicine review and a 2013 CDC study affirming that no link exists between vaccines and autism spectrum disorder.

  • The updated text claims that health authorities have ignored studies supporting a link and mentions that the Department of Health and Human Services is conducting a comprehensive assessment of autism's causes.

  • The phrase 'Vaccines do not cause autism' remains on the new webpage due to an agreement with Senator Bill Cassidy, who is the chair of the Senate's Health Committee and a medical doctor.

  • Anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense, founded by Kennedy, expressed approval of the CDC's changes, framing them as an acknowledgment of a supposed truth about vaccine safety.

  • Medical professionals, including Dr. Jake Scott from Stanford University, criticized the revision as political pressure overriding scientific evidence, calling it a dangerous precedent for medical communication.

  • The CDC also removed a webpage detailing the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women, indicating ongoing updates to align with recommendations from the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.

Latest Health

Related Stories