Elderly NYC man fatally shoots career criminal who allegedly lunged at him — and gets prison sentence for infuriating reason
A 67-year-old man, Charles Foehner, received a four-year prison sentence after shooting and killing a career criminal who lunged at him in Queens, New York. Although the Queens District Attorney's Office chose not to prosecute Foehner for the shooting, he pleaded guilty to possessing an unlicensed firearm, which led to his conviction. His attorney criticized the stringent gun laws in New York, arguing that they unfairly penalize law-abiding citizens and contended that Foehner's actions were defensive. The case highlights ongoing tensions surrounding self-defense laws and gun rights in urban areas. Foehner’s sentencing is scheduled for January 14, 2026, allowing him to spend Christmas with his family before serving time.
Dive Deeper:
The incident occurred in 2023 when Foehner shot Cody Gonzalez, who was attempting to rob him and was perceived to be armed with a knife, which turned out to be a pen. Foehner, a retired doorman, claimed he was carrying the gun for self-defense due to rising crime.
Foehner's attorney, Thomas Kenniff, referred to him as a 'hero' and criticized New York's gun laws as 'draconian,' stating that they make it difficult for citizens to legally carry firearms for protection.
The plea deal stemmed from the potential risk of facing 25 years in prison if convicted on multiple gun charges, including possession of various unlicensed firearms found in his home.
The Queens DA's Office did not pursue charges related to the shooting itself, emphasizing that Foehner acted in self-defense, but opted to charge him for illegal possession of firearms.
Foehner's fate has sparked debate over the rights of citizens to defend themselves and the adequacy of current gun laws, with advocates arguing for reforms that would better support lawful self-defense.
The case follows a series of incidents in New York City where individuals have faced legal consequences for using firearms in self-defense, raising concerns among gun rights advocates about the balance between safety and personal liberty.