No Cinderellas, No Surprises: Inside a Loaded Final Four

Hunter Tierney
By Hunter Tierney
April 4, 2026
No Cinderellas, No Surprises: Inside a Loaded Final Four

We're down to four at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis on Saturday night, and this is a genuinely good Final Four β€” a No. 2 seed riding a comeback for the ages, a No. 3 seed that has been the most balanced team in the country for the last six weeks, and two No. 1 seeds that have been operating at a different level than everyone else in this bracket. Get ready to be glued to your couch for 5+ hours on Saturday night.

Game 1: (2) UConn vs. (3) Illinois β€” 6:09 p.m. ET, TBS

Mar 29, 2026; Washington, DC, USA; UConn Huskies forward Tarris Reed Jr. (5) dunks the ball against the Duke Blue Devils in the second half during an Elite Eight game of the East Regional of the men's 2026 NCAA Tournament at Capital One Arena.
Credit: Amber Searls-Imagn Images

Illinois, the No. 3 seed out of the South Region, is favored by 2.5 points over a UConn program that has won 18 straight games in the Sweet 16 or later and has cut down the nets in two of the last three tournaments. Brad Underwood's team has earned that line β€” they've been dominant in ways that don't always show up in the box score. But the Huskies are the Huskies, and Dan Hurley has spent years building a team that knows exactly how to survive in April.

Start with what UConn just did. Down 19 to the No. 1 overall seed, 1-of-18 from three in the first half, Hurley visibly furious on the sideline β€” the Huskies shouldn't have made it past Duke. The reason they did is Tarris Reed Jr., who finished with 26 points on 10-of-16 shooting, nine rebounds, four blocks, and two steals. Duke had no real answer for him down low. In four games, Reed averaged 22 points and 14 rebounds. He was named the Regional Most Outstanding Player, and it wasn't particularly close.

Illinois, though, just might be their toughest test yet. They've won their four tournament games by a combined 87 points. They've held three of those four opponents under 60 points and 39% from the field. Underwood locked this team in when the bracket came out and they've looked like a different defense than the one that ranked outside the top 25 nationally heading into March.

The offense has been great all year. Keaton Wagler, a freshman, is averaging 18 points, 7 rebounds, and four assists a game in the tournament while shooting 44 percent from deep. He's the engine β€” but David Mirkovic inside and Andrej Stojakovic on the perimeter give Illinois enough secondary options that defenses have to respect. Illinois ranks first nationally in adjusted offensive efficiency on KenPom, they're third in offensive rebounding percentage, they don't turn it over, and they almost never foul. That formula is dangerous, and it's been working.

The One Thing Illinois Hasn’t Proven Yet

The problem with Illinois in this spot isn't their ceiling β€” it's what happens when games get tight. Since early November, they've played six games decided by fewer than six points and lost all six. Four of them went to overtime. The losses came against Michigan State, Kansas, Missouri, Michigan, Purdue, and Iowa β€” not a soft list. But it does make you wonder if they get a bit tight when the game is close down the stretch.

UConn already beat Illinois once this year, 74-61 in New York on November 28. The four Illini starters who are now averaging double digits in the tournament combined for 18 points on 6-of-27 shooting in that game β€” 2-of-13 from three. November isn't April, and Illinois is a different team than they were then. But Hurley had the blueprint sitting in his film room before this tournament tipped off, and he'll have spent all week sharpening it.

The more specific issue is ball security. UConn forced double-digit turnovers in all four of their tournament games. Illinois has averaged nine a game over their last three. Against a UConn defense that turns live-ball turnovers into fast transition buckets, those can kill you. The rebounding advantage Illinois has had so far is real and could swing the game β€” but if Reed decides to take over the paint like he has been, that advantage may not last.

The matchup inside is genuinely interesting. Mirkovic is a capable post scorer β€” 44 percent of his attempts this season come at the rim β€” but he has to do it against Reed, who is playing the best basketball of his career right now. If Mirkovic can keep Reed occupied and draw him into some foul trouble, Illinois can create real problems for UConn at both ends.

The Pick

Illinois is the better team by just about every measure right now. If this is a 10-point game, they probably win. Their rebounding margin alone could be worth eight to ten points over 40 minutes, and Wagler has been too efficient to contain for a full game.

But this is UConn in April, which is a different category of team. They don't lose games like this. The 0-for-6 record in close games for Illinois isn't a fluke β€” it shows you something about how they respond to pressure. Hurley's teams have been built for that exact scenario, and Reed and Karaban and Mullins have all shown they know how to make the right play when the game is on the line. I think Illinois is going to win this game β€” but if it's just a three-point game with under two minutes left, I might not feel the same way.

Game 2: (1) Arizona vs. (1) Michigan β€” 8:49 p.m. ET, TBS

Feb 28, 2026; Tucson, Arizona, USA; Arizona Wildcats forward Koa Peat (10) celebrates during the first half of the game against the Kansas Jayhawks at McKale Memorial Center.
Credit: Aryanna Frank-Imagn Images

This is the game people have been circling since January. Arizona and Michigan have been KenPom's top two teams for most of the season. Duke was the one team that seemed like they might be capable of keeping pace, and now they're out. Both programs blew through their regional brackets β€” Arizona winning by an average of 21 points, Michigan at 23 β€” and now they finally have to beat each other to get to the National Championship. It's the right game at the right time.

What's going to make this game even more compelling to watch is that both teams are trying to do the same thing: impose themselves physically inside, force the game to slow down on their terms, and let the defense create chaos on the other end. Michigan is first in adjusted defensive efficiency. Arizona is second. Michigan is first in effective field goal percentage allowed. Arizona is second. In 2-point defense, Arizona is second and Michigan is third. Two programs built on identical blueprints.

Where This Matchup Starts to Separate

Arizona ranked fifth nationally in paint points during the regular season and led the entire country in free throw attempts β€” and it doesn’t feel forced when you watch them. Everything is downhill, everything is physical, and eventually, teams just start giving ground. In the tournament, that identity has only gotten louder. Against Arkansas in the Sweet 16, the Wildcats piled up 60 paint points and 30 from the line β€” the most in an NCAA Tournament game in the last 20 years β€” and somehow did it while attempting fewer than 10 threes.

That’s not normal in today’s game. Then against Purdue in the Elite Eight, they were down seven at halftime and didn’t panic. They just kept leaning on it. By the end, it was a 48-26 second half, with another 40 paint points and 20 free throw points. Same pressure, same effect.

Freshmen Brayden Burries and Koa Peat have been the primary drivers β€” Burries at 18 points and six rebounds a game in the tournament, Peat at 18 and seven. Jaden Bradley, the Big 12 Player of the Year, is the connector β€” he can score, distribute, and is aggressive enough attacking the rim to draw a crowd. Tommy Lloyd has built a team where any one of three or four guys can take over on a given night, which makes scouting them a total mess.

Michigan's answer to all of that is Yaxel Lendeborg, who is probably the best individual player left in this tournament. In his Elite Eight win over Tennessee β€” a 95-62 final β€” he had 27 points, seven rebounds, four assists, and really put on a show. He's a forward who can be used in transition, in the post, and in spread pick-and-roll situations. Dusty May doesn't have to call a specific play for him β€” he just puts him in motion and lets him create chaos.

Behind Lendeborg, the depth is real. Aday Mara is 7-foot-3 and can rim-protect, switch onto the perimeter, and hit a three when opponents try to take away the lane. Morez Johnson Jr. is another physical, switchable forward. Elliot Cadeau had 10 assists against Tennessee. Michigan can come at you in waves, which is why they've had 11 wins by 30-plus points this year and scored over 90 in all four tournament games.

Same Philosophy, Different Ceiling

Michigan's biggest pain point all year has been turnovers β€” 12 per game in the regular season, 257th in the country. Against a defense that does a great job protecting at the rim and on closeouts the way Arizona does, you're going to feel that. Lendeborg is a willing passer, which is part of what makes him great, but the ball moving in traffic is exactly how you hand Arizona extra possessions. If Michigan is careless with it in the first half, Arizona could make them pay and get out to a lead quickly.

The other thing Michigan needs to manage is Aday Mara's fouls. Arizona's going to attack the paint relentlessly β€” that's not a strategic adjustment for them, it's just what they do β€” and Peat and Burries are both capable of drawing contact at the rim. If Mara picks up two fouls in the first ten minutes, Dusty May has to figure out how to guard Arizona's size with a considerably shorter lineup out there. That's a problem that has derailed Michigan before.

On the other side, Michigan's perimeter shooting is the variable Arizona can't match. The Wolverines have shot 46 percent or better from three in three of their four tournament wins. If they're making threes at that rate, it forces Arizona's defense to cover more ground than they want to, which creates the kind of driving lanes Lendeborg and Cadeau are going to punish. Michigan made 10 threes against Tennessee. If they're anywhere close to that on Saturday, Arizona has a long night ahead of them.

What I keep coming back to, though, is that Arizona's path to winning doesn't require everything to go right. Attack the paint, get to the line, steal a few possessions, and trust the defense to make things difficult in the second half. That formula worked against Arkansas when they were clicking offensively and it worked against Purdue when they weren't.

The Pick

Michigan forward Yaxel Lendeborg (23) walks off the court after 80-72 loss to Purdue at the Big Ten Tournament final at United Center in Chicago on Sunday, March 15, 2026.
Credit: Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Michigan is the -1.5 favorite and I understand why. Lendeborg is the best player on the floor. This game could absolutely end with him having 30 and the Wolverines punching their ticket to Monday.

But I'm taking Arizona here. The turnovers concern me for Michigan in this specific matchup, and I think the free throw volume alone gives Arizona a floor they can count on, even on a night where the threes aren't falling. When both teams' offenses are this talented, it's going to come down to who can execute their plan for 40 minutes. Arizona's formula is more consistent than Michigan's; their depth gives them fresher legs, and Lloyd has these boys playing at the top of their game.


Looking for stories that inform and engage? From breaking headlines to fresh perspectives, WaveNewsToday has more to explore. Ride the wave of what’s next.

Latest Sports

Related Stories