News Page

Main Content

Records Offer Glimpses Inside the Doomed Prosecution of Eric Adams

The New York Times's profile
The New York Times
4h ago
Records Offer Glimpses Inside the Doomed Prosecution of Eric Adams

Context:

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan indicted New York Mayor Eric Adams on five counts of corruption, including bribery and wire fraud, linked to his mayoral campaigns and ties to Turkey. Despite the extensive evidence gathered, including search warrants and electronic data, the Trump administration ordered the case's dismissal, allegedly in exchange for Adams' cooperation on immigration policy. Judge Dale E. Ho dismissed the charges, but criticized the apparent quid pro quo between Adams and the Trump administration. Adams consistently maintained his innocence, claiming the case was unfounded, while his legal team argued the investigation was a grave injustice. The case's dismissal followed significant resignations among Justice Department officials, who objected to the perceived political motivations behind dropping the prosecution.

Dive Deeper:

  • The corruption investigation into Mayor Eric Adams began in August 2021, focusing on his fundraising activities and connections to Turkey, culminating in a five-count indictment by federal prosecutors in Manhattan.

  • Despite securing warrants and collecting data from over 60 devices, the Trump administration intervened in February 2025, ordering the case's dismissal, purportedly to ensure Adams' cooperation with Trump's immigration agenda.

  • Judge Dale E. Ho granted the dismissal, citing constitutional limits on judicial power over executive prosecution decisions, but criticized the administration for appearing to exchange legal leniency for political favors.

  • The investigation included attempts to seize Adams' devices, with an incident suggesting possible obstruction when Adams allegedly failed to provide his personal cellphone to federal agents.

  • The case's dismissal led to resignations within the Justice Department, as several officials, including the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, objected to what they perceived as a quid pro quo arrangement between Adams and the Trump administration.

  • Adams consistently denied wrongdoing throughout the investigation, suggesting divine intervention in the dismissal and maintaining the case was an unfounded attack on his integrity.

  • Following the dismissal, Adams' visit to the White House was perceived as an effort to express gratitude to President Trump, although Adams stated the visit was to discuss city matters.

Latest News

Related Stories