Russia-Ukraine talks turn to post-war security but end without breakthrough
Trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi involving Russia, Ukraine and the US aimed at shaping Europe’s post-war security framework concluded without a breakthrough, leaving momentum uncertain after an emotionally and politically hard round. The discussions signaled potential prisoner exchanges and underscored disputes over Europe’s security architecture, especially NATO’s role and how to secure assurances for Ukraine without immediate ceasefire concessions. US negotiators signaled openness to broader European involvement, while Moscow pressed on conditions tied to Donetsk and NATO’s influence. A second round was urged, with future momentum likely dependent on iterated talks and a clearer path on territory, security guarantees, and war termination.
Dive Deeper:
Trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi between Russia, Ukraine and the US wrapped after a second day with only limited openings and no indications of a breakthrough to end the nearly five-year war sparked by Russia's invasion.
Ukraine’s lead negotiator Davyd Arakhamia called the session one of the hardest, noting Russia entered with strict directives, but he remained optimistic about momentum and pressed for another round as soon as possible.
Both sides confirmed a large-scale prisoner-of-war exchange was being considered and could occur soon, signaling a potential but uncertain humanitarian and strategic development.
The talks framed security architecture for Europe, with Kyiv seeking assurances of allied aid and Moscow seeking limits on NATO influence in eastern Europe; US and European figures debated broader involvement and a new security framework.
There was disagreement on whether a ceasefire should precede or follow a security framework agreement, and any peacetime security framework hinges on war termination and bilateral territorial settlements, particularly around Donetsk.
Kushner stressed that trust is currently lacking between the sides, acknowledging the emotional and complex nature of the negotiations and signaling that a durable deal would require both sides to move beyond current stalemates.
The discussions also highlighted divergent views on post-war security dynamics, the role of European partners, and the practical steps needed to reach a sustainable peace, with a second round anticipated to push these issues forward.